Dream or nightmare

I don’t watch much TV and rarely watch live TV, but I did so recently and was quite surprised by the adverts, particularly that there were so many for gambling. The theme of the gambling ones seemed to be “it’s great fun and you will love doing it” shortly followed by “don’t do it very much and you can get help to stop” which seemed quite incongruous to me.

However, the ones that really struck me were for a cruise line, advertising a “dream cruise”. The picture that accompanied them seemed to me to be quite horrifying, one was something like the picture below and others showed liners amongst beautiful scenery in fjords or whatever. The only thing that these adverts said to me was “environmental disaster”. I have never been on a cruise and certainly wouldn’t want to go on one after seeing these adverts.

Perhaps I am weird (many would say so!), but it makes me wonder whether these adverts actually result in people buying the product (gambling or cruises) . I am afraid that they put me off.

Are the days of cruise ship chaos in Dubrovnik behind us?

UK Covid Strategy

The Government has spent months congratulating itself on our vaccination programme, but vaccinating everyone does not seem to be its strategy. We had a fast rollout by using the Astra-Zeneca vaccine which was easier to distribute than the mRNA vaccines, but which has proved to be less effective. Today we have a lower proportion of our population vaccinated than most European countries (UK: 66.93%% vs France: 67.88%, Italy: 71.32%, Ireland: 75.21%, Spain: 79.77%, Portugal: 87.16%). Most of these have had measures to encourage vaccines take-up such as a requirement to have a Covid pass for many public venues such as bars and restaurants.

We are trying to catch-up for the lower effectiveness of AZ by giving a mRNA booster, which will no doubt be a considerable help. However there doesn’t seem to be any strategy to encourage greater take-up. I presume that this is because the government does not believe that it could get its own party to support more authoritarian measures and as a result its strategy for the remaining third of people who are unvaccinated is to let them catch Covid in order to get antibodies into their bodies. At least our Covid death rate is moderate (we are 27th on the list of deaths/1m population), so maybe it is a tolerable strategic choice.

Aged Monarchs

Our Queen is 95 and has been a dedicated public servant for all her life. She now seems to be struggling to perform her role, a problem that is only likely to get worse over the next few years. An old monarch is a modern problem as no-one lived that long in the past and monarchs in days gone buy were liable to be dethroned by an upstart once they got old. Of course there are a few notable exceptions, but that was the general scheme.

Whatever you think of the Monarchy, and I am somewhat ambivalent, it doesn’t seem sensible to me to have a head of state that is so old and infirm that they can no longer perform their duties. It is said that she will never abdicate, but I don’t buy all the “called by God to the role” stuff. She is in a job she can no longer perform effectively and I think she should retire.

On the other hand, she may realise that the enthronement of King Charles is likely to be the beginning of the end of the Monarchy and so is hanging on for as long as she can. Unfortunately her descendants have created a royal soap opera that would be unbelievable if it was fiction which has fatally damaged the institution. It is possible that they are just symptoms of an institution in terminal decline who are caught up in the whole sorry spectacle. It doesn’t really matter – they should just get on with the succession and let the end game commence.

It’s no fun being a virus

You came into existence because your “parent” invaded a cell in someone’s body. It gave up its genetic material and died so that the cell would produce new copies, you are one of them. Finally the cell ejected you and died itself, leaving you to float around and, if you are lucky, find another cell to invade. You may have to be quick because if you are unlucky, the person you invaded will die and that is the end of your prospects. On the other hand, they might survive but will have made antibodies that prevent you reproducing and kill you.

Before either of these happens, you might be one of those viruses that get ejected from the host when it coughs. You float around in the outside world, in the air, maybe settling on some surface. Unfortunately this isn’t a good environment for you and if you don’t find a person to invade soon, you are finished. If you strike lucky, you find your way into another person. Maybe they breathe you it, or maybe touch the surface where you are sitting and pick you up. Later, they touch their face and are breathed in and you get into their lungs. Away you go inside them, floating around until you hit a cell that you can invade.

At first, the world is a fertile place for you, there are lots of people for your kind to invade. Unfortunately, over time, they either die or they develop antibodies which thwart you. They might start social distancing so that when you are coughed out into the world, you can’t find a new host in time before you die. They might develop a vaccine and so they all have antibodies which stop you in you tracks. Eventually the world becomes a less and less fertile place for you. The heyday of your kind flourishing in their trillions are past. There are fewer and fewer people available to invade and so you eke out an existence attacking the weak and vulnerable.

After your brief and dazzling career, you sink into obscurity. At some point another virus comes along and becomes all the rage for a time. You are forgotten, just a page of history. It’s no fun being a virus.

Predicting the future is hard

I keep hearing calls that we need to “follow the science” as we plan to lift the lockdown. The problem with this is twofold.

Firstly, science isn’t able to predict the future with any certainty. The predictions being made are based on computer models which hope to be able to capture mathematically all the things that can affect the situation. This isn’t easy and it is hard to get a model that is perfectly right. On top of that, even if the models are perfect, there are still many things that are not known and assumptions have to be made. Some of the things that we don’t currently know can be scientifically investigated, but this takes time. An example would be the level of protection gained once someone has had the disease. Other things (such as the people’s willingness to comply with restrictions) are harder to determine and may be quite volatile. As we don’t know so many things, the scientists have to make assumptions for the unknown variables. Unfortunately are lots of unknowns so that there are many possible scenarios depending on the assumptions made. Deciding on the most likely outcome becomes a matter of judgement, not science.

Secondly, the progress of the disease is only one issue. People’s lives, their jobs, the economic situation, other health issues and the willingness of people to adhere to restrictions are all things that have to be taken into account. There is no computer model or scientific expert that can tell anyone the right answer.

Our politicians have to take all the data, all the best judgements (many of which are judgements, a posh word for guesses, even if made by famous scientists) and decide what to do. As always, different people will have different ideas and there will be considerable debate.

After it is all over, we will know how good the decisions were. One thing that is certain, there will be many things that don’t go as planned. How could it be otherwise as there are so many things that we don’t know.

Another thing that is certain is that those who made the decisions, in good faith, with all the best advice available, will be pilloried in the future by those who have the power of hindsight. It’s tough at the top!

The thoughts of the Walrus

The Walrus started blogging some years ago, but didn’t last very long and let the domain lapse. He is not quite sure why he didn’t continue but supposes it was mostly idleness and the distractions of life in general. Now we are in lockdown due to the Coronavirus he has more time on his hands, so is going to give it another try.

The world is what it is, but we all see it from different perspectives. We all stand on our own hilltops looking at the same landscape seeing different things. The Walrus’ hilltop is based on a scientific training, a career in business and a strong belief in Enlightenment principles. Despite this he has a Christian perspective with somewhat Stoic tendencies.